Investigation finds inappropriate conduct pattern, ‘egregious’ meeting violation

A Wisconsin Department of Justice investigation uncovered a pattern of inappropriate conduct by former Grand Chute Supervisor Ron Wolff and his allies, but a special prosecutor has declined to file charges against them.

The allegations were detailed in an Aug. 14 story in the Appleton Post-Crescent. According to the story: 

Special agent Jay Yerges from DOJ’s Division of Criminal Investigation investigated Wolff beginning in October 2021 — six months after Wolff was elected town supervisor. The investigation was in response to Wolff’s primary residence being located in Nichols, not Grand Chute.

Outagamie County District Attorney Melinda Tempelis sent the case to David Lasee, who is Brown County’s district attorney, to determine whether criminal charges should be filed. Lasee found that Wolff “very likely misrepresented his residence, multiple times, and at a minimum was not a full-time resident of the town he represented”; that Wolff and his town board allies faclitated the termination of the town administrator in a meeting where that action was not clearly noticed; and, that Wolff and his town board allies used private email addresses to discuss town business and excluded at least one board member. 

While determining there is sufficient evidence to prosecute the residency and open meetings law violations, Lasee said proceeding with charges against Wolff now would not be in the best interest of the public.

Neither Wolff nor his allies are on the town board in 2025.

The investigation also found a May 2, 2023 town board meeting that discussed the employment termination of the town administrator was “egregious,” according to Lasee.

“The violation was egregious because the supervisors knew there was public interest in the matter,” Lasee wrote as part of an eight-page decision declining to prosecute. 

The eight-page document also notes that a forfeiture would be “largely symbolic.”

“The forfeiture itself likely would be paid by the town itself, despite the fact that the offending board members no longer represent the town,” Lasee’s decision reads.